EN Nutrition Reviews

Uses the GI tract naturally, which helps maintain digestion and absorption.

Lower infection risk than parenteral feeding in many patients, with evidence of fewer infectious complications and better outcomes in several settings.

Cheaper and simpler to deliver than parenteral nutrition.

Can prevent or treat malnutrition when eating enough by mouth is not possible.

May help preserve gut function and support recovery in appropriate patients.

Can cause GI side effects such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal distention, and constipation.

Can lead to metabolic problems like electrolyte imbalance, fluid imbalance, and glucose intolerance.

Tube-related issues can occur, including irritation, dislodgement, blockage, and aspiration risk.

May be poorly tolerated in some patients, with vomiting and feeding intolerance reported in reviews.

Does not work well if the GI tract is not usable or if feeding access is not feasible.